🔗 Share this article Intensifying Rhetorical Battle Involving Ethiopian Government and Eritrean Government Triggers Fears of Armed Clash Mounting concerns exist over the possibility of warfare involving East African neighbours, Ethiopia and Eritrea, as aggressive rhetoric has ratcheted up in recent weeks. Ethiopia and Eritrea were allies in the civil war in northern Ethiopia but they have subsequently disagreed. What Did Ethiopian Officials Said? Landlocked Ethiopia's demands for entry to the Red Sea through Eritrea has triggered a intense rhetorical conflict. The Ethiopian leader first openly declared in 2023 that his government's access to the sea was an vital issue, remarks that Eritrean authorities dismissed. Diplomatic connections between the neighboring nations have often been tense. After a prolonged battle for independence, Eritrea, which has a long Red Sea coastline, officially seceded from Ethiopian rule in 1993, making it without sea access. Subsequently, a military clash erupted in which numerous people lost their lives. Latest Statements from Ethiopia's Government Prime Minister Abiy and army chief the army commander have openly claimed ownership of Eritrean maritime facility of Assab – about 60km from the boundary - and hinted at the intention to capture it through military means. In early September, the Prime Minister said the country's "blunder" of being denied passage to the Red Sea as a because of Eritrea secession would be "corrected in the future". The Ethiopian envoy to Kenya, former General Bacha Debele, said that the port was "Ethiopia's wealth" and would be returned "through military action". Eritrea's Response to the Threats Despite ongoing warnings from Ethiopian officials, Eritrea's reaction has been limited to brief comments on online platforms from Communications Head the minister. He has rejected Ethiopia's demand for access to the Red Sea describing it as "risky" and a "toxic agenda" of "irredentism" – a approach of reclaiming previous domains. The information ministry warned on mid-September that attempts to validate "obvious provocation" would have significant repercussions for the Ethiopian government and its regional partners and is a "boundary that should not be crossed|violated|breached". Security Movements on the Region There have been little evidence of significant troop deployments in the frontier regions between the neighboring states. Nevertheless, in the country, national TV has broadcast training completions of numerous trainees at various military training camps. The director of personnel division of the military, the officer, commented lately in an interview that the military was in a "strong stance" as "many thousands of recruits" were entering service, which he said was "a message to our opponents". Previous Roots of the Tension For more than half a century from 1890, the territory was ruled by Italian colonisers. After Italy's defeat, it was then controlled by the British military before evolving into a federated part of Ethiopia. Yet in the early 1960s the ruler ended this system and the region became totally absorbed into the Ethiopian state. A extended internal conflict followed, concluding with military reversal in 1991. Autonomy was then approved by Eritreans in a plebiscite in 1993. Briefly in the 1990s, there were good relations between the authorities in Ethiopia's capital and Asmara, but they clashed over the exact location of their shared boundary, causing hostilities in 1998. Although this ended in a truce in 2000, it was incompletely executed, and the both countries remained at odds. This situation improved in 2018, when the Prime Minister made approaches to Eritrean President President Isaias. The two signed a announcement that the conflict was concluded – a action that gained Abiy the Nobel Peace Prize. The neighboring states were then partners in Ethiopia's recent armed struggle in the northern region. But ties have subsequently deteriorated anew.