🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.