🔗 Share this article A Growing ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Affluence and Hardship Are Found Cheek by Jowl in Across England. Within Nunsthorpe, residents occupy properties only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them. “It’s the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.” A Stark National Picture Analysis of government figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the poorest in the nation. The geographical widening of poverty has led to a significant increase in the number of places where disadvantaged and well-off people find themselves living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the wealthiest. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data. A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The wall is much more than a metaphorical divide; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines. The school commute that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute detour. Access to important services like supermarkets, schools and employment centres is hindered. The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with instances of rubbish being thrown over the wall and related problems. “You try to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the rusted metal wall. Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Hardship Within a local community centre, staff stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director a community leader. Regardless of being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally. A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious houses built in the 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and quality of surroundings. “They might have larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said Phil Hockley, 63. “You’ll probably find many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The financial divide is clear: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side comparable properties go for about £410,000. Locals describe a tangible sense of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” said resident Susan. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.” The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an ever more divided society, where prosperity and deprivation are often uncomfortably in close proximity.
Within Nunsthorpe, residents occupy properties only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally divides the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them. “It’s the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, 37. “It’s been like this for as long as I’ve known. I don’t think they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.” A Stark National Picture Analysis of government figures shows the extent of inequality often exists, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a neighbourhood classified as one of the poorest in the nation. The geographical widening of poverty has led to a significant increase in the number of places where disadvantaged and well-off people find themselves living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the wealthiest. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data. A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the most pronounced in the country and starkly obvious. The wall is much more than a metaphorical divide; it creates tangible difficulties for daily routines. The school commute that should take 15-20 minutes turn into an sixty-minute detour. Access to important services like supermarkets, schools and employment centres is hindered. The area often sees vandalism and loitering, with instances of rubbish being thrown over the wall and related problems. “You try to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you reside facing that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the rusted metal wall. Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Hardship Within a local community centre, staff stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director a community leader. Regardless of being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, Nunsthorpe boasts a fierce loyalty and feeling of togetherness among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area is classified among the most prosperous 10% nationally. A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent This pattern is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious houses built in the 2000s that are in the top 10% for job prospects and quality of surroundings. “They might have larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said Phil Hockley, 63. “You’ll probably find many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The financial divide is clear: an typical family home costs about £275,000 on the estate, while on the other side comparable properties go for about £410,000. Locals describe a tangible sense of neglect. “This part of the community gets ignored,” said resident Susan. “Over here our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.” The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an ever more divided society, where prosperity and deprivation are often uncomfortably in close proximity.